Am I for or against guns
I think that acces to guns should be limited. I think that people should be trained in how to use them, that they should have holders for them that are government approved and inspected in any house holding a gun and that these holders should be completely child proof. I think that it's stupid to only let the government have guns because then if the government becomes corrupt the people will have no means of defending themselves against the governemnt and starting a new one. So that idea is ridiculous, but there needs to be a specific purpose for each gun and things like fingerproof guns should be outlawed because nobody protecting their family or shooting a deer cares if they have their fingerprints on the gun. Only people who are attempting to harm and murder others have need of that kind of gun. There should be more restrictions on what kind of guns the public is allowed to have, but guns should not be outlawed in general. the same holds true of the authors theory of knives instead of guns. if the public has knives and the government has guns, then if the gov becomes corrupt, then they can shoot the ppl with knives long before they get close enough to shoot them. Unless you can throw a knife, but then that becomes more dangerous like a bullet could, though not as serious because it would diffcult for a thrown knife to go through a wall and come out the other side a kill someone. but still. she needs a better theory than knives. lol. ok buh bye